Kings and cults of personality
      I have been listening to "Out    of Mao's Shadow" by Phillip Pan.  It's the story of the last years of    Mao in China, a time when the governing party tried rigorously to control    expression of ideas.  As I listened, I thought of the story "1984" by    George Orwell.  The idea of suppressing dissent, imprisoning and    executing those who expressed alternate views and disagreement with the    policies and practices of the government is one that we are all familiar with.     I am not much of a student of history but I wouldn't be surprised if all    governments have an imperfect record of supporting human rights.  But the    idea of erasing the record of someone's existence, of trying to make the    historical record show only what some people desire it to show, of controlling    the past, is not a new one but still seems pathetic as well as cruel,    pointless, and ultimately an impossibility.
  I    wonder if ancient emperors and kings tried to convince people they were    perfect, divine, flawless.  I imagine that modern photography, tv, and    other media make possible attempts at trying to get every citizen to know and    revere the great leader.  It might not have been as tempting when a few    statues and portraits were more or less the limit of saying who this marvel    was.  The Bible does refer to Ceasar's image on coins so maybe the cult    of personality was also a possibility then.  The more I think about it,    the more I remember the divine birth or parentage of even the pharoahs, so I    suppose the tendency to worship and to encourage worship does go back a long    way. As I check on "pharoah"    and    find that such rulers were explicity the political and the religious leader in    one, I see how limited is my experience and my idea of a leader and commander    of the people.


<< Home