The brain and the mind continue to surprise and amaze. In the interests of a so-called ‘gold standard’ in science, we try to test a drug or procedure against a worthy alternative. We don’t want to get too tricky or complicated so we try to run a control group that gets something acceptable as a treatment but thought by the researcher to be null, void, dull, zilch. As usual, it is not that easy to find something acceptable, attractive but genuinely empty of content and effect.
Wired magazine has a
good article on placebos. It turns out that aspirin vs. sugar pills that are red will give slightly different results for the placebo group from a group that gets sugar pills that are blue. The article discusses the effects of different colors of pills.
Now the Mind Hacks blog has an
article on research by Martina Amanzio and her associates who compared the ‘side effects’ found in the placebo groups of 3 different studies on quite different types of drugs. They found that the ‘side effects’ from the placebo for one type of drug were more similar to the side effects of the actual drug than to placebo effects in a different study.
The link above to the Amanzio study mentions that all participants in a study get told the side effects that might come up so maybe the placebo group is primed by that information.
<< Home