Complaints about freshman English
      I know freshman English is a    broad topic.  There has got to be a wide variety of incoming freshmen,    from those who have little skill with writing to those who are    currently reporters, novelists and essayists.  I have read that one of    the first ideas of what an educated person should aim to be was the model of a    speaker.  In the pre-microphone days, a speaker who    could be heard over a crowd and who could speak without notes and give a    meaningful, rousing statement was a person (male, probably) who    mattered.  That was actually in the days when writing was a    technical skill that was mastered by only a few, maybe like engine or tv    repair today.
It is still a technical skill but is now considered one    that close to everyone can master.  As noted for me in the memorable book    "Style: An Anti-Textbook" by Richard A. Lanham, reading is    basically a type of input into our brains and arithmetic, the third of the    famous 3 R's, is usually presented as a chore of calculation to be    completed by the learner, but writing is an    art.  It is a delivery from the person's mind to the outside.
Even 20 years or more ago, many colleges and universities (and I am sure, high schools and others) focused on writing as a personal creation tool that any student could use to explain mastery of content and ideas. Such a student could also write a statement of personal feelings, questions, criticisms and reactions to issues in a way that revealed something of the sort of person the writer was. That focus is often called 'writing across the curriculum' or something similar.
Thus, freshman English is often considered a doorway through which the competent writer can enter into many different studies.


<< Home